If the government of the liberal revolution harassing citizens with canon
not long been appointed by the Minister of Economic Development Paul Romans. But it has already managed to make us regret the void in which he vacated his seat for months.
The newspapers today give an account of his idea to pay fees Rai to anyone with an active connection to the electricity grid: families, the public and professionals.
Why, suppose the minister, who also has the power to secure the TV. He adds: " Who has not television will prove it, and only then will not pay .
Perhaps the Minister will be forgiven in the eyes of a certain public opinion, his past as a publisher of private television, which had been criticized at the time of appointment.
not long been appointed by the Minister of Economic Development Paul Romans. But it has already managed to make us regret the void in which he vacated his seat for months.
The newspapers today give an account of his idea to pay fees Rai to anyone with an active connection to the electricity grid: families, the public and professionals.
Why, suppose the minister, who also has the power to secure the TV. He adds: " Who has not television will prove it, and only then will not pay .
Perhaps the Minister will be forgiven in the eyes of a certain public opinion, his past as a publisher of private television, which had been criticized at the time of appointment.
However, this enthusiasm from the public produced a neophyte outliers. (more. ..)
Having the power implies the possession of television? But there are also TV sets, camping. Therefore, the presumption in presumption, for consistency the mere fact of living in a settled somewhere, not to sleep in the open, we should force you to pay TV license fee.
When the state assumed something, you do not know why, always assumed the best for him and worse for the citizens. This is a real abuse.
I remain stubbornly stuck at basic concept is the state to prove the failures (or worse) of its citizens. And not the other way.
remains then to understand how the city can demonstrate the 'non-possession' of television. Self-sufficient? Or should be sent photographs of all rooms in the house (or bar, or the study) to the land register, taken from every angle? But the cabinets and furniture would not be closed, however, suspicions? The documentation must be accompanied by case by stamps? In short, the citizen must pay to prove his honesty?
I want to say loud and clear here that the 'presumption of law' is always a way to elevate the agency to illiberal form of government.
can not not know, can not have, can not see .
formulas that are already in the mouth of the city, evoking the bad fumes of a low-grade rhetoric.
Having the power implies the possession of television? But there are also TV sets, camping. Therefore, the presumption in presumption, for consistency the mere fact of living in a settled somewhere, not to sleep in the open, we should force you to pay TV license fee.
When the state assumed something, you do not know why, always assumed the best for him and worse for the citizens. This is a real abuse.
I remain stubbornly stuck at basic concept is the state to prove the failures (or worse) of its citizens. And not the other way.
remains then to understand how the city can demonstrate the 'non-possession' of television. Self-sufficient? Or should be sent photographs of all rooms in the house (or bar, or the study) to the land register, taken from every angle? But the cabinets and furniture would not be closed, however, suspicions? The documentation must be accompanied by case by stamps? In short, the citizen must pay to prove his honesty?
I want to say loud and clear here that the 'presumption of law' is always a way to elevate the agency to illiberal form of government.
can not not know, can not have, can not see .
formulas that are already in the mouth of the city, evoking the bad fumes of a low-grade rhetoric.
But in the mouths of those who represent the body which holds a monopoly on force (according to the old definition of 'State'), they simply fear and revulsion.
The fact is that the underlying problem, for State, is insoluble except with the agency: the possession of television is unprovable, if not with raids on the homes of Italians to 21.30 pm. And is insoluble because the rent - that is a fake pass to allegedly pay for those who do not wish to use the services as authorized - is exactly what he said Fantozzi Potiemkin of armor, a 'crazy shit'. Have the courage
Instead, the State, to approve a tax obligations that citizens generally to a new high taxes to maintain the plethora of state television. Why this is, in fact, the license fee. Forages that a host of journalists and structures, with their three goals, do the same job all other private TV stations, and how they go in search of audience and advertising are plenty of forage.
The fact is that the underlying problem, for State, is insoluble except with the agency: the possession of television is unprovable, if not with raids on the homes of Italians to 21.30 pm. And is insoluble because the rent - that is a fake pass to allegedly pay for those who do not wish to use the services as authorized - is exactly what he said Fantozzi Potiemkin of armor, a 'crazy shit'. Have the courage
Instead, the State, to approve a tax obligations that citizens generally to a new high taxes to maintain the plethora of state television. Why this is, in fact, the license fee. Forages that a host of journalists and structures, with their three goals, do the same job all other private TV stations, and how they go in search of audience and advertising are plenty of forage.
The fee for the public channels, in this context, it is abnormal, serious distortion of competition between networks.
The European Union, a huge bureaucratic leviathan that has always something to say about everything, recalled not long ago because the Italian religious institutes that carry out activities for the public (clinics, etc.), not paying the ICI, would be unduly advantage against other companies operating in the same areas.
On the phenomenon of public television, however, has nothing to complain?
The European Union, a huge bureaucratic leviathan that has always something to say about everything, recalled not long ago because the Italian religious institutes that carry out activities for the public (clinics, etc.), not paying the ICI, would be unduly advantage against other companies operating in the same areas.
On the phenomenon of public television, however, has nothing to complain?
0 comments:
Post a Comment